NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FirePro V5800 DVI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 DVI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
ATI FirePro V5800 DVI 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (74W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+65%
1.828 TFLOPS
FirePro V5800 DVI
1.104 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.04 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1104 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
74W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
Juniper
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Juniper XT GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
