NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (1785MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1630
1.828 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
179
GeForce GTX 1630
+58%
283
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2022
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
1740 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
TU117
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
