NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
2576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1594%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
22
240
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
70W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
AD107
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
