NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Sky 900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 3GB VRAM Radeon Sky 900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 75% (1665MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Sky 900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon Sky 900
+14%
3.405 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Mar 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Sky
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Tahiti
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Orthrus
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
