Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (2640MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +353%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
2505 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
18
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
2560
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
AD107
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy