Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD FirePro D700

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD FirePro D700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 6GB VRAM FirePro D700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (90W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro D700 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (263.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
2.849 TFLOPS
FirePro D700 +22%
3.482 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1370 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
263.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
896
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Tahiti
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

90W
TDP
274W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy