NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320M and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 20 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1283MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (189.4GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
1256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320M
0.053 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 20
+6096%
3.284 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2010
Release Date
Nov 2018
GeForce 300M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
815 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1283 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
740 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
1024bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
189.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
3
SM Count
-
24
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.06 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.569 TFLOPS
52.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.284 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
205.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
Vega 12
-
GPU Variant
Vega 12 XTA
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
