NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX130
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX130 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 30W)
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1189MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (40.10GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
360 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320M
0.053 TFLOPS
GeForce MX130
+1622%
0.913 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2010
Release Date
Nov 2017
GeForce 300M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1109 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1189 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
24
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.512 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.54 GTexel/s
-
-
-
52.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
913.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
28.54 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N16S-GTR-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
5.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
