NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320M and 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 110W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
7400 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320M
0.053 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
+46541%
24.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2010
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 300M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1290 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
58
24
Shading Units
7424
8
TMUs
232
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.2 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
386.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.72 TFLOPS
52.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
386.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
