NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M vs AMD FirePro M5725
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320M and 512MB VRAM FirePro M5725 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (23W vs 35W)
AMD FirePro M5725 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
296 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320M
0.053 TFLOPS
FirePro M5725
+715%
0.432 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2010
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 300M
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
3
SM Count
-
24
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
52.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
23W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
M96
-
GPU Variant
M96 GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
