NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320M and 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.28GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
8 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320M
+35%
0.053 TFLOPS
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2010
Release Date
Jan 2010
GeForce 300M
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
2
24
Shading Units
16
8
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.140 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.280 GTexel/s
-
-
-
52.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
23W
TDP
11W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GT218
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
