NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD Radeon RX 5300M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (16W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1445MHz vs 993MHz)
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 920MX
0.508 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300M
+700%
4.069 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 920MX
382
Radeon RX 5300M
+856%
3653
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 900M
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
965 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
993 MHz
Boost Clock
1445 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
256
Shading Units
1408
24
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.944 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.24 GPixel/s
23.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
127.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.138 TFLOPS
508.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.069 TFLOPS
15.89 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
254.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
16W
TDP
85W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
Navi 14
N16V-GMR1-S
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XLM
Maxwell
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
