NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD FirePro W6170M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX and 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock993MHz
AMD FirePro W6170M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 920MX
0.508 TFLOPS
FirePro W6170M
+287%
1.971 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 900M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
965 MHz
Base Clock
-
993 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
256
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.944 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
23.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
508.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
15.89 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
16W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
Emerald
N16V-GMR1-S
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.08 billion
Unknown
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
