NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD Radeon R5 M255
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (993MHz vs 940MHz)
AMD Radeon R5 M255 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 920MX
0.508 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M255
+41%
0.721 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Oct 2014
GeForce 900M
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
965 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
993 MHz
Boost Clock
940 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
256
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.944 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.520 GPixel/s
23.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
721.9 GFLOPS
508.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
721.9 GFLOPS
15.89 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
16W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
Topaz
N16V-GMR1-S
GPU Variant
Topaz PRO
(216-0858030)
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.55 billion
Unknown
Die Size
125 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
