Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
2552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q +30800%
6.18 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
682 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.23GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
20
8
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.116 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
2.116 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

13W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GA107
G98-700-U2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
80 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net