Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +20905%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
GeForce 8
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
16
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy