NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 OEM and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 OEM
0.035 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+65728%
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
40
16
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
