AMD FireStream 9370 vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+30%
2.64 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jun 2010
FireStream
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
1440
80
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Cypress
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0
