AMD FireStream 9370 vs AMD FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+243%
2.64 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
