AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
TITAN X Pascal
+997%
10.97 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2016
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
28
800
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GP102
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
