AMD FireStream 9250 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2008
FireStream
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
RV380
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0
3.3
OpenGL
2.0
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
-
