AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 130W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
5824 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+5278%
26.73 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Aug 2023
FireStream
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
320
Shading Units
6144
16
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
130W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
