Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7000 vs ATI FirePro V9800

AMD FirePro W7000 vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800 +11%
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
20
1280
Shading Units
1600
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Cypress
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy