Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M

AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M +341%
1.651 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280M
0.374 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Mar 2009
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-IV

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
60.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
128
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.360 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
374.5 GFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
G92
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
N10E-GTX
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy