Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

AMD FirePro W4300 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000 +989%
15.56 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
22 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net