Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X +578%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
64
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Fiji
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy