Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI FirePro V3900

ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1120 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +323%
2.64 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
6
1600
Shading Units
480
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Turks
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Turks GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

208W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy