NVIDIA CMP 70HX vs ATI FirePro V8800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 70HX and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 70HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 70HX
+305%
10.71 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1188 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
608.3GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
30
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
1600
120
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
120
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
167.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
10.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
167.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
208W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
Cypress
GA104-100-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
