Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI FirePro V3800

ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +256%
1.856 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Apr 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
5
1280
Shading Units
400
80
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Redwood
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
43W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy