Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1240 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +5700%
1.856 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
2
1280
Shading Units
40
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
RV620
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy