Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +4330%
23.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
400
Shading Units
5120
20
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
AD104
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net