Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +46%
5.238 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
44
Compute Units
12
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 24
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy