AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 141GB VRAM H200 SXM 141 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 700W)
NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1980MHz
More VRAM (141GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
H200 SXM 141 GB
+1219%
66.91 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2024
FirePro
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1980 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
512bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
2816
Shading Units
16896
176
TMUs
528
64
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1045 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
267.6 TFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.91 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.45 TFLOPS
Board Design
235W
TDP
700W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1100 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
GH100
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
80 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
6.3
Shader Model
N/A
