AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
+11164%
5.069 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT PCI
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2816
Shading Units
16
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
235W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
G96C
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
