AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (235W vs 580W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2
+11%
5.632 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
512bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
2816
176
TMUs
176
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
235W
TDP
580W
550 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
Hawaii
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT
(215-0852000)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3
