Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +140%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Aug 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
64
1792
Shading Units
4096
112
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Fiji
Orthrus
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
175W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy