AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA T600 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 4GB VRAM T600 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T600 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
T600 Max Q
+91%
2.5 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
960
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Blackcomb
GPU Name
TU117
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
