Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +444%
1.306 TFLOPS
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
12
Compute Units
-
960
Shading Units
96
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
20.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
GF117
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
N13M-NS1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy