Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M7820 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

AMD FirePro M7820 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M7820 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M7820 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M7820
1.12 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +166%
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro Mobility
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
28
800
Shading Units
1792
40
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1120 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Broadway
GPU Name
Amethyst
Broadway XT GL
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
5 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy