Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M6100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

AMD FirePro M6100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6100 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1125MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M6100
1.651 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q +39%
2.304 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.00 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.608 TFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.304 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Saturn
GPU Name
TU117
Saturn XT GL (216-0843006)
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
30W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy