AMD FirePro M3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 20W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M3900
+1100%
0.24 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2010
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
11.23GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
160
Shading Units
8
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.116 GPixel/s
6.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.116 GTexel/s
-
-
-
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Seymour
GPU Name
G98
Seymour GL
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
