AMD FirePro A320 vs Intel UHD Graphics 48EU Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 and 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 48EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel UHD Graphics 48EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1150MHz vs 955MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro A320
0.733 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics 48EU Mobile
+20%
0.883 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
Trinity
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
955 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.80 GPixel/s
22.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.766 TFLOPS
733.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
883.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
220.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Devastator
GPU Name
Alder Lake GT1
A320
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 12.2
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
