AMD FirePro A320 vs NVIDIA ION
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 and 0System Shared VRAM ION to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock955MHz
368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA ION 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro A320
+2055%
0.733 TFLOPS
ION
0.034 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2008
Trinity
Generation
ION
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Base Clock
-
955 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
384
Shading Units
16
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
22.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
733.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.24 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Devastator
GPU Name
GT218
A320
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
