AMD FirePro A320 vs Intel Arc Graphics 64EU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 64EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Graphics 64EU 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 99% (1900MHz vs 955MHz)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro A320
0.733 TFLOPS
Arc Graphics 64EU
+165%
1.946 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2024
Trinity
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
955 MHz
Boost Clock
1900 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
22.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
60.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.891 TFLOPS
733.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.946 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Devastator
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
A320
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
3 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
17.8 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
243 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.8
