ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA PG506 232
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
PG506 232
+12800%
10.32 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
80
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GA100
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.0
Shader Model
N/A
