ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1360 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
+2420%
2.016 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2010
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1440
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Cypress
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0
