ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
17W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
RV560
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0
