ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 130W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
6104 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+83431%
26.73 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
160bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
40
Shading Units
6144
4
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
AD104
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
