ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360 896SP
+6059%
1.971 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
896
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Tobago
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Tobago XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
