ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano
+39462%
12.66 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1247 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Vega 10
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT
(215-0894200)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
